Statistical and context-based diagnostics for Digital Twin environments
 
More details
Hide details
1
Tenneco Inc. ul. Usługowa 20, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland
 
2
Department of Fundamentals of Machinery Design, Silesian University of Technology, ul. Konarskiego 18A, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland
 
 
Submission date: 2026-04-07
 
 
Final revision date: 2026-06-15
 
 
Acceptance date: 2026-06-22
 
 
Online publication date: 2026-06-23
 
 
Publication date: 2026-06-23
 
 
Corresponding author
Anna Maria Timofiejczuk   

Department of Fundamentals of Machinery Design, Silesian University of Technology, ul. Konarskiego 18A, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland
 
 
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
The Digital Twin concept is increasingly applied in engineering practice to support simulation-based design and validation processes. However, ensuring consistency between simulations and experimental data remains a critical challenge. In engineering systems identical statistical patterns can originate from different causes, so it may lead to incorrect diagnostic conclusions. This paper proposes an approach that integrates statistical validation methods with context-based reasoning to improve the interpretation of data in Digital Twin environments. The proposed framework combines data preprocessing techniques with statistical analysis and context-based reasoning. The applicability of the approach is shown through a representative case study. The results confirm that the integration of statistical methods with context-based reasoning enhances the robustness of Digital Twin systems and supports more effective use of simulation in modern engineering environments.
FUNDING
This research received no external funding.
REFERENCES (25)
1.
Bartodziej CJ. The Concept Industry 4.0. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, New York. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-....
 
2.
Elafri N, Tappert J, Rose B, Yassine M. Lean 4.0: Synergies between Lean Management tools and Industry 4.0 technologies. IFAC-PapersOnLine. 2022; 55(10):2060–2066. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifac....
 
3.
Fuller A, Fan Z, Day C, Barlow C. Digital Twin: Enabling technologies, challenges and open research. IEEE Access. 2020;8:108952–108971. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS....
 
4.
Garcia P, Radous J, Krol A, Bosek J, Baeten C. Lean Product Development. How to Create Flow? Reflection after a 4 Years Implementation in One Business Unit – Part 1. SAE 2016 World Congress and Exhibition, 2016. https://doi.org/10.4271/2016-0....
 
5.
Gilchrist A. Industry 4.0. Apress, Berkeley, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-....
 
6.
Grieves M. Vickers J. Digital Twin: Mitigating unpredictable, undesirable emergent behavior in complex systems. In: Transdisciplinary Perspectives on Complex Systems. Springer, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-....
 
7.
Gudanowska A. Transformation towards Industry 4.0 – identification of research trends and aspects of necessary competences in the light of selected publications. Research in Logistics & Production. 2017;7(5):431–444.
 
8.
Jones D, Snider C, Nassehi A, Yon J, Hicks B. Characterising the Digital Twin: A systematic literature review. CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology. 2020; 29:36–52.
 
9.
Król A, Timofiejczuk A, Łukasik T. Diagnostic and qualitative aspects in the digital twins implementation. In: Peruń G., Konieczny Ł. (eds.), Diagnostyka Maszyn. XLVIII Ogólnopolskie Sympozjum. Wisła, 2022.
 
10.
Król A, Timofiejczuk A, Łukasik T. Cyfrowy bliźniak w procesie projektowania produktu. In: Projektowanie, budowa i eksploatacja maszyn. Studia i Monografie, Politechnika Opolska, 2022;574:121–130.
 
11.
Kritzinger W, Karner M, Traar G, Henjes J, Sihn W. Digital Twin in manufacturing: A categorical literature review and classification. IFAC-PapersOnLine. 2018;51(11):1016–1022.
 
12.
Lee J, Bagheri B, Kao HA. A cyber-physical systems architecture for Industry 4.0-based manufacturing systems. Manufacturing Letters. 2015;3:18–23.
 
13.
Loska A, Moczulski W, Wyczółkowski R, Dąbrowski M. Integrated system of control and management of exploitation of water supply system. Diagnostyka 2016; 17(1).
 
14.
Monostori L. Cyber-physical production systems: Roots, expectations and R&D challenges. CIRP Annals. 2014;63(2):621–641. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp....
 
15.
Phanden RK, Sharma P, Dubey A. A review on simulation in digital twin for aerospace, manufacturing and robotics. Materials Today: Proceedings. 2021; 38:174–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matp....
 
16.
Piromalis D, Kantaros A. Digital twins in the automotive industry: The road toward physical-digital convergence. Applied System Innovation. 2022;5(4):65.
 
17.
Poniewierski A. SPEED: bez granic w cyfrowym świecie. Speednolimits.com Sp. z o.o., Wilcza Góra, 2020.
 
18.
Resman M, Protner J, Simic M, Herakovic N. A five-step approach to planning data-driven digital twins for discrete manufacturing systems. Applied Sciences. 2021;11(8):3639.
 
19.
Shao G, Janin S, Laroque C, Lee LH, Lendermann P, Rose O. Digital Twin for smart manufacturing: the simulation aspect. IEEE Conference Publications, 2019.
 
20.
Tao F, Zhang H, Liu A, Nee AYC. Digital Twin in industry: State-of-the-art. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics. 2019;15(4):2405–2415. https://doi.org/10.1109/TII.20....
 
21.
Temich S, Pollak A, Kucharczyk J, Ptasiński W, Mężyk A, Gąsiorek D. Prediction of energy consumption in the industry 4.0 platform - Solutions overview. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics. 2021;59(3):455–468. https://doi.org/10.15632/jtam-....
 
22.
Timofiejczuk A. Ujęcie kontekstowe w budowie i eksploatacji maszyn. Monografia, Politechnika Śląska, Gliwice, 2026.
 
23.
Timofiejczuk A. An example of the use of contexts in diagnostics of manufacturing processes. Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Modern Manufacturing Technologies in Industrial Engineering (ModTech), 2024.
 
24.
Uhlemann THJ, Schock C, Lehmann C, Freiberger S, Steinhilper R. The Digital Twin: Demonstrating the potential of real-time data acquisition in production systems. Procedia Manufacturing. 2017; 9:113–120.
 
25.
Wilczewski G, Siergiejczyk M. Testing of a data center environment with a generic model of a cloud-based telecommunication service. Diagnostyka. 2016;17(1).
 
eISSN:2449-5220
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top