Analysis of SVM-SMOTE algorithm and AdaBoost-RBF algorithm for low-voltage switch fault diagnosis
More details
Hide details
1
Guangdong Power Grid Co., Ltd. Jieyang Jiedong Power Supply Bureau, Jieyang 522000, China
Submission date: 2026-01-22
Final revision date: 2026-10-22
Acceptance date: 2026-11-09
Online publication date: 2026-11-10
Publication date: 2026-11-10
Corresponding author
Sheng Xie
Guangdong Power Grid Co., Ltd. Jieyang Jiedong Power Supply Bureau, Jieyang 522000, China
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Low-voltage switch fault diagnosis is challenged by imbalanced fault samples and insufficient recognition of minority classes. This study proposes a hybrid SVM-SMOTE-AdaBoost-RBF (SSAR) model that combines SVM-guided minority-class oversampling with adaptive ensemble-based nonlinear classification. In the proposed framework, SVM-SMOTE uses decision-boundary information to support minority-class sample balancing, while AdaBoost-RBF adaptively adjusts sample weights and performs fault classification. Experimental results show that SVM-SMOTE achieved a data completeness rate of 96.45% on the CWRU-CB dataset and a fault-type recognition accuracy of 98.11% on the NASA-Relay dataset. On the self-generated dataset, SSAR achieved a diagnostic accuracy of 98.24%, a precision of 97.11%, a recall of 95.98%, and an F1-score of 96.48%, with a diagnosis time of 2.08 s for 100 iterations. These findings indicate that integrating boundary-guided sample balancing with adaptive nonlinear classification can improve fault diagnosis under imbalanced data conditions. Further validation under realistic operating conditions is required to establish its practical applicability.
FUNDING
This research received no external funding.
REFERENCES (32)
1.
Pandey AK, Kishor N, Mohanty SR, Samuel P. Intelligent fault detection and classification for an unbalanced network with inverter-based DG units. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics. 2024;20(5): 7325-7334.
https://doi.org/10.1109/TII.20....
2.
Guerrero JM, Aranzabal I, Gomez-Cornejo J, Eguia P, Zarate S, Platero CA. Ground fault detector for DC microgrids using sequentially-switched grounding connections. IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications. 2024; 60(6): 8888-8900.
https://doi.org/10.1109/TIA.20....
3.
Luo R, Gao H, Peng F, Guo Y. An adaptive low-voltage ride-through method for virtual synchronous generators during asymmetrical grid faults. IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy. 2024;15(3):1589-1600.
https://doi.org/10.1109/TSTE.2....
4.
Aluri VRK, Samantaray SR. An improved probe power unit (PPU)-based fault location estimation in low-voltage DC microgrids. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid. 2024;15(6):5514-5525.
https://doi.org/10.1109/TSG.20....
5.
Kumar VTRP, Arulselvi M, Sastry KBS. Comparative assessment of colon cancer classification using diverse deep learning approaches. Journal of Data Science and Intelligent Systems. 2023;1(2):128-135.
https://doi.org/10.47852/bonvi....
6.
Que Z, Lin CJ. One-class SVM probabilistic outputs. IEEE transactions on neural networks and learning systems. 2024;36(4):6244-6256.
https://doi.org/10.1109/TNNLS.....
7.
Cortes C, Vapnik V. Support-vector networks. Machine Learning. 1995;20(3):273–297.
https://doi.org/ 10.1007/BF00994018.
8.
Ali L, Javeed A, Noor A, Rauf HZ, Kadry S, Gandomi AH. Parkinson’s disease detection based on features refinement through L1 regularized SVM and deep neural network. Scientific Reports 2024; 14(1): 1333-1346.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598....
9.
Uzel H, Özüpak Y, Alpsalaz F, Aslan E. Optimized ANN–RF hybrid model with optuna for fault detection and classification in power transmission systems. Scientific Reports. 2025;16(1).
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598....
10.
Hairani H, Widiyaningtyas T, Prasetya DD. Addressing class imbalance of health data: a systematic literature review on modified synthetic minority oversampling technique (SMOTE) strategies. JOIV: International Journal on Informatics Visualization. 2024;8(3):1310-1318.
https://doi.org/10.62527/joiv.....
11.
Chawla NV, Bowyer KW, Hall LO, Kegelmeyer WP. SMOTE: Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research. 2002;16: 321–357.
https://doi.org/10.1613/jair.9....
12.
Nugroho K, Muslikh AR, Iriananda SW, Ojugo AA. Integrating SMOTE-tomek and fusion learning with XGBoost meta-learner for robust diabetes recognition. Journal of Future Artificial Intelligence and Technologies. 2024;1(1):23-38.
https://doi.org/10.62411/faith....
13.
Guemmour MB, Negadi K, Araria R, Bey M. Analysis and fault diagnosis in point absorber wave energy conversion systems using fault tree and Bayesian networks. Diagnostyka. 2025;26(2):2025209.
https://doi.org/10.29354/diag/....
14.
Wang S, Liu W, Yang S, Huang H. An optimized AdaBoost algorithm with atherosclerosis diagnostic applications: adaptive weight-adjustable boosting. The Journal of Supercomputing. 2024;80(9):13187-13216.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227....
15.
Freund Y, Schapire RE. A decision-theoretic generalization of on-line learning and an application to boosting. Journal of Computer and System Sciences. 1997;55(1):119–139.
https://doi.org/10.1006/jcss.1....
16.
Li T, Xia Q, Ouyang Y, Zeng R, Liu Q, Li T. Prospectivity and uncertainty analysis of tungsten polymetallogenic mineral resources in the nanling metallogenic belt, south china: a comparative study of AdaBoost, GBDT, and XgBoost algorithms. Natural Resources Research. 2024;33(3):1049-1071.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11053....
17.
Li M, Yu D, Chen Z, Xiahou K, Ji T, Wu QH. A data-driven residual-based method for fault diagnosis and isolation in wind turbines. IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy. 2018;10(2):895-904.
https://doi.org/10.1109/TSTE.2....
18.
Karamichailidou D, Gerolymatos G, Patrinos P, Sarimveis H, Alexandridis A. Radial basis function neural network training using variable projection and fuzzy means. Neural Computing and Applications. 2024; 36(33):21137-21151.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521....
20.
Zhang Y, Cao J, Zhang B, Zheng X, Chen W. A comparative study of different radial basis function interpolation algorithms in the reconstruction and path planning of γ radiation fields. Nuclear Engineering and Technology. 2024;56(7):2806-2820.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.....
21.
Deb A, Jain AK. An effective data-driven machine learning hybrid approach for fault detection and classification in a standalone low-voltage DC microgrid. Electrical Engineering. 2024;106(5):6199-6212.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00202....
22.
Wahyuni SD, Kusumodestoni RH. Optimalisasi algoritma support vector machine (SVM) dalam klasifikasi kejadian data stunting. Bulletin of Information Technology (BIT). 2024;5(2):56-64.
https://doi.org/10.47065/bit.v....
23.
Zhou Z, Xu C, Qiao Y, Xiong J, Yu J. Enhancing equipment health prediction with enhanced SMOTE-KNN. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Applied Science, 2024;2(2):13-20.
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo....
24.
Modhugu VR, Ponnusamy S. Comparative analysis of machine learning algorithms for liver disease prediction: SVM, logistic regression, and decision tree. Asian Journal of Research in Computer Science. 2024;17(6): 188-201.
https://doi.org/10.9734/ajrcos....
25.
Jasim AA, Hazim LR, Mohammedqasim H, Mohammedqasim R, Ata O, Salman OH. e-Diagnostic system for diabetes disease prediction on an IoMT environment-based hyper AdaBoost machine learning model. The Journal of Supercomputing. 2024;80(11): 15664-15689.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227....
26.
Lin H, Dai H, Mao Y, Wang L. An optimized radial basis function neural network with modulation-window activation function. Soft Computing. 2024;28(5):4631-4648.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500....
27.
Li B, Wu J. Low-voltage arc fault identification using a hybrid method based on improved salp swarm algorithm–variational mode decomposition–random forest. IEEE Access. 2024;12:15410-15418.
https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS....
28.
Venkatachalam Y, Subbaiyan T. Intelligent fault diagnosis in power systems: A comparative analysis of machine learning-based algorithms. Expert Systems with Applications. 2025;265:125945.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa....
29.
Al-Haddad LA, Shijer SS, Jaber AA, Ani ST, Zubaidi AA, Abd ET. Application of AdaBoost for stator fault diagnosis in three-phase permanent magnet synchronous motors based on vibration–current data fusion analysis. Electrical Engineering. 2024;106(4):4527-4542.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00202....
30.
Ziad H, Al-Dujaili A, Humaidi AJ. Techniques used in faults detection of permanent magnet synchronous motor: A review. AIP Conference Proceedings. 2024; 3232(1):030004.
https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0236....
31.
Faraj HZ, Al-Dujaili AQ, Humaidi AJ. The classification method of electrical faults in permanent magnet synchronous motor based on deep learning. In: 2023 IEEE 11th Conference on Systems, Process & Control (ICSPC). Malacca, Malaysia. 2023. p. 326–331.
https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSPC5....
32.
Ziad H, Al-Dujaili AQ, Humaidi AJ. A comparative study of deep learning efficiency in the classification of electrical faults of permanent magnet synchronous motor. International Review of Applied Sciences and Engineering. 2025;16(2):292–302.
https://doi.org/10.1556/1848.2....