The concept of DMAIC methodology application for diagnostics of potential incompatibilities in aeronautical data request process
 
 
 
More details
Hide details
1
Politechnika Warszawska
 
 
Submission date: 2018-05-14
 
 
Final revision date: 2018-06-25
 
 
Acceptance date: 2018-09-03
 
 
Online publication date: 2018-09-04
 
 
Publication date: 2018-09-04
 
 
Corresponding author
Ewa Dudek   

Politechnika Warszawska, Koszykowa 75, 00-662 Warszawa, Polska
 
 
Diagnostyka 2018;19(4):33-38
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
The article is a continuation of the Author’s study on the ways to ensure the quality and safety of aeronautical data and information in the entire process of those data and information creation, collection, processing and publication. This time, however, the emphasis was placed on the possibility to use the DMAIC methodology for diagnostics of potential incompatibilities in aeronautical data request process. At the beginning the DMAIC methodology was presented and the aeronautical data and information, as well as the aeronautical data chain, were described. The Author paid special attention to the data request process, as it is considered to be the most critical chain’s stage. The proceeding diagram for this process, based on valid legal requirements, was elaborated and described. Then the concept of DMAIC methodology application was presented together with the proposed changes in the mentioned proceeding diagram. Finally, regarding the FMEA analysis, presented in one of the previous articles [19], the new values of FMEA rating scales for: consequence of failure - variable S, likelihood of failure - variable R and the most important one - the ability to the detect the problem - variable W were estimated. At the end, conclusions were drawn.
 
REFERENCES (19)
1.
Annex 4 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation, Aeronautical Charts. 2009.
 
2.
Annex 8 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation. Airworthiness of Aircraft. 2010.
 
3.
Annex 13 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation, Aircraft Accident and Incident Investigation. 2010.
 
4.
ICAO Annex 15 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation, Aeronautical Information Services, International Civil Aviation Organization, July 2013. Commission Regulation (EU) No 73/2010.
 
5.
Dudek E, Kozłowski M. Analysis of aeronautical information potential incompatibility – case study. Journal of Konbin. 2017;41:59-82.
 
6.
Dudek E, Kozłowski M. Koncepcja wykorzystania wybranej karty Shewharta do diagnostyki niezgodności mierzonych danych geoprzestrzennych. Pomiary Automatyka Robotyka, PIAP. 2017;3: 69-74. https://doi.org/10.14313/PAR_2...
 
7.
Dudek E, Kozłowski M. Koncepcja zastosowania metodyki DMAIC do zapewnienia jakości danych lotniczych, in: Kwasiborska A. (red.): Transport lotniczy i jego otoczenie. Wydział Transportu Politechniki Warszawskiej. 2016: 67-78.
 
8.
Dudek E, Kozłowski M. The concept of a method ensuring aeronautical data quality. Journal of KONBiN. 2016;1(37): 319-340.
 
9.
Eurocontrol Specification for Data Assurance Level, Reference nr: EUROCONTROL-SPEC-148, 2012.
 
10.
IEC 60812:2006. Analysis techniques for system reliability, Part 2 Procedure for failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA). 2006.
 
11.
ISO 13053-1:2011. Quantitative methods in process improvement - Six Sigma - Part 1: DMAIC methodology.
 
12.
ISO 13053-2:2011. Quantitative methods in process improvement - Six Sigma - Part 2: Tools and techniques.
 
13.
ISO 31010. Risk management – Risk assessment techniques. 2009.
 
14.
Kozłowski M, Dudek E. Risk analysis in air transport telematics systems based on aircraft’s Airbus A320 accident, in: Smart Solutions in Today’s Transport / Mikulski Jerzy (red.). Communications in Computer and Information Science. 2017;715:385-395.
 
15.
Myszewski J. Po prostu jakość: podręcznik zarządzania jakością. Wydawnictwa Akademickie i Profesjonalne. 2009.
 
16.
Polish National Civil Aviation Safety Program, Civil Aviation Authority of the Republic of Poland. 2016.
 
17.
Schroth Wolfgang R. Aeronautical Data Quality - A New Challenge for Surveyors; FIG Congress 2014 Engaging the Challenges - Enhancing the Relevance Kuala Lumpur. Malaysia 16 – 21 June 2014.
 
18.
Siergiejczyk M, Kozłowski M, Dudek E. Diagnostics of potential incompatibilities in aeronautical data and information chain. Diagnostyka. 2017; 18(2): 87-93.
 
19.
Wenguang X. Means for Avionics Manufacturers to Define the Aeronautical Data Quality Requirements, International Conference on Systems and Informatics. 2012: 2383-2387. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSAI....
 
eISSN:2449-5220
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top