Current issue
Online first
Archive
About the Journal
Guide for Authors
3/2020 vol. 21
Stats
CC BY 3.0
Get citation
Diagnosis of hybrid systems through bond graph, observers and timed automata
Lotfi Mhamdi 1
,
 
Achbi Mohammed Said 2
,
 
Hedi Dhouibi 3
,
 
Sihem Kechida 3
 
 
 
More details
Hide details
1
Laboratory of Automatic Signal and Image Processing (LARATSI), University of Kairouan, Tunisia
 
2
Laboratory of Automatic Signal and Image Processing (LARATSI), University of Kairouan, Tunisia
 
3
Laboratoire d’Automatique et Informatique de Guelma (LAIG lab.), Université 8 Mai 1945 Guelma, BP 401, Guelma 24000, Algérie
 
 
Submission date: 2020-04-01
 
 
Final revision date: 2020-07-26
 
 
Acceptance date: 2020-08-17
 
 
Online publication date: 2020-08-24
 
 
Publication date: 2020-08-24
 
 
Diagnostyka 2020;21(3):113-125
DOI: https://doi.org/10.29354/diag/126444
 
 
Article (PDF)
References (46)
 
KEYWORDS
fault diagnosis
Observer
Bond Graph
Timed Automata
Fault Localization
 
TOPICS
Diagnostic systems
Reliability
Technical diagnostics
 
ABSTRACT
Despite technological advances and progress in industrial systems, the fault diagnosis of a system remains a very important task. In fact an effective diagnosis contributes not only to improved reliability but also to a decrease in maintenance costs. This paper presents an approach to a diagnosis of hybrid systems thanks to the use of Bond Graphs, Observer and Timed Automata. Dynamic models (in normal and failing mode) are generated by an observer based methods as well as through state equations generated by the Bond Graphs model. The procedure of fault localization through a method based on the observer does not allow locating faults with the same signature of failure. Thus the diagnosis technique for the localization of these defects will be based on the time analysis using Timed Automata. The proposed approach is then validated by simulation tests in a two tanks hydraulic system.
 
REFERENCES (46)
1.
Branicky MS. Studies in hybrid systems: Modeling, Analysis and Control. Ph.D thesis, Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science – MIT Cambridge. 1995.
Google Scholar
 
 
2.
Alur R, Courcoubetis C, Henzinger TA, Ho PH. Hybrid automata: an algorithmic approach to the specification and verification of hybrid systems. In Hybrid Systems, LNCS. 1993; 736:209-229.
Google Scholar
 
 
3.
Le Bail J, Alla H, David R. Hybrid Petri nets. In Proceedings of the European Control Conference, Grenoble, France. 1991:1472-1477.
Google Scholar
 
 
4.
Mosterman PJ. Hybrid dynamic systems: a hybrid Bond-Graph modeling paradigm and its application in diagnostic. Ph.D thesis, Vanderbilt University 1997.
Google Scholar
 
 
5.
Ould Bouamama B, Medjaher K, Samantaray AK, Staroswiecki M. Supervision of an industrial steam generator. Part I: Bond graph modelling. Control Engineering Practice. 2006:14:71–83.
Google Scholar
 
 
6.
Dhouibi H, Bochra M, Simeu Abazi Z, Hassani M. Diagnosis approach using bond graph and timed automata. IJAREEIE. 2013;2(9).
Google Scholar
 
 
7.
Bengtsson J, Wang Yi. Timed automata: semantics, algorithms and tools. In lecture Notes on Concurrency and Petri Nets, W. Reisig and G. Rozenberg (eds), LNCS 3098, Springer-Verlag, 2004.
Google Scholar
 
 
8.
Saeed Ghasemi, Leili Mohammad Khanli, Mina Zolfi, Ghader Tahmasebpour. Modeling and Simulation of NFC Logical Layer Peer-to-Peer Mode using CPN and TA. International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering (IJECE). 2014;4(2): 162-168.
Google Scholar
 
 
9.
Mhamdi L, Dhouibi H, Simeu-Abazi Z, Liouane N. Using constrained Petri nets and timed automata for modelling of discrete event systems. IJE. 2014;27: 113-122.
Google Scholar
 
 
10.
Gascard E, Simeu-Abazi Z. Modular Modelling for the Diagnostic of Complex Discrete-Event Systems. IEEE Trans. on Automation Science and Engineering. 2013;10(4):1101-1123.
Google Scholar
 
 
11.
Zineb Simeu-Abazi and al. Fault diagnosis for discrete event systems: modelling and verification. Reliability Engineering et systems Safet. 2010;95(4): 369-378.
Google Scholar
 
 
12.
Paynter HM. Analysis and design of engineering systems. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts. 1961.
Google Scholar
 
 
13.
Mukherjee A, Karmakar R. Modelling and simulation of engineering systems through bond graphs. Alpha sciences international. 2000.
Google Scholar
 
 
14.
Thoma JU, Ould Bouamama B. Modelling and simulation in thermal and chemical engineering: A Bond graph approach. Springer Science & Business Media. 2013.
Google Scholar
 
 
15.
Ould-Bouamama B, Medjaher K, Bayart M, Samantaray AK, Conrard B. Fault detection and isolation of smart actuators using bond graphs and external models. Control Engineering Practice. 2005; 13:159–175,.
Google Scholar
 
 
16.
Ould-Bouamama B, El Harabi R, Abelkrim MN, Ben Gayed MK. Bond graphs for diagnosis of chemical processes. Computers & chemical engineering. 2012; 36: 301–324.
Google Scholar
 
 
17.
Panos Antsaklis, Xenofon Koutsoukos, Janan Zaytoon. On hybrid control of complex systems: a survey. ADPM’98, Reims, France. 1998.
Google Scholar
 
 
18.
Dauphin-Tanguy G. Les Bond Graphs. Hermes Sciences Europe Limited, Paris. 2000.
Google Scholar
 
 
19.
Karnopp DC, Rosenberg RC. System Dynamics: A unified Approach. John Wiley, New York. 1974.
Google Scholar
 
 
20.
Borutzky W. Bond Graph Modelling and Simulation of Multidisciplinary Systems: An introduction. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory. 2009;17(1):3-21.
Google Scholar
 
 
21.
Paynter HM. Analysis and design of engineering systems. MIT Press, Cambridge. 1961.
Google Scholar
 
 
22.
Touati Y. Diagnostic Robuste et estimation de défauts à base de modèle Bond Graph. Ph.D thesis. 2012.
Google Scholar
 
 
23.
Chen J, Patton RJ. Robust model-based fault diagnosis for dynamic systems. The International Series on Asian Studies in Computer and Information Science. 1999.
Google Scholar
 
 
24.
Chen J, Patton RJ, Zhang HY. Design of unknown input observers and robust fault detection filters. IJC, 1996; 63(1):85–105.
Google Scholar
 
 
25.
Frank PM. Analytical and qualitative model-based fault diagnosis - a survey and some new results. European Journal of Control. 1996;2:6–28.
Google Scholar
 
 
26.
Patton RJ. Robust model-based fault diagnosis: the state of the art. IFAC Safe process Symposium, Espoo, Finland. 1994:1-24.
Google Scholar
 
 
27.
Gauthier JP, Hammouri H, Othman S. A Simple Observer for Nonlinear Systems Applications to Bioreactors. IEEE Trans on Automatic Control. 1992;37:875–880.
Google Scholar
 
 
28.
René Husson et al. Automatique du cahier des charges à la réalisation de systems. Edition Dunod, Paris. 2007.
Google Scholar
 
 
29.
Perry Y. Li. University of Minnesota ME 8281: Advanced Control Systems Design. 2001-2012.
Google Scholar
 
 
30.
Sava AT. Sur la synthese de la commande des systemes a evenements discrets temporises. Ph.D thesis, Laboratoired’Automatique de Grenoble. 2001.
Google Scholar
 
 
31.
Simeu-Abazi Z, Rayhane H, Bennani T, Bouredji Z. Optimisation des temps de detection dans la surveillance des systemes. 5eme Congres International de Genie Industriel. 2003: 25-29.
Google Scholar
 
 
32.
Lajmi F, Talmoudi AJ, Dhouibi H. Fault Diagnosis of Uncertain Systems Based onInterval Fuzzy PETRI Net, Studies in Informatics and Control. 2017;26(2):239-248. https://doi.org/10.24846/v26i2....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
33.
Maaref B, Ghabi J, Simeu-Abazi Z. A mixed approach for modeling and fault diagnosis of hybrid dynamical systems with unknown disturbance. Studies in Informatics and Control. 2018;27(3):307-318.
Google Scholar
 
 
34.
Miguel Hernandez, Basilio Del Muro, Domingo Cortes, Juan Carlos Sanchez. An Easy to Apply Methodology for Fault Detection and Isolation in Linear Systems. Studies in Informatics and Control. 2012;21(3):275-282.
Google Scholar
 
 
35.
Guerra RV, Rubio JM, Cuéllar BM, Sánchez GID. Dynamic delayed controllers for unstable recycling systems with time delays. Studies in Informatics and Control. 2016;25(2):195-206.
Google Scholar
 
 
36.
Campos-Rodriguez R, Alcaraz-Mejia M. An efficient testing for the detection of trajectories in discrete-event systems modelled by S-Nets. Studies in Informatics and Control. 2016;25(3):363-374.
Google Scholar
 
 
37.
Mhamdi L, Dhouibi H, Simeu-Abazi Z, Liouane N. Modelling approach for discrete event systems through petri nets and timed automata. In 2013 International Conference on Control, Decision and Information Technologies (CoDIT). 2013:166-171.
Google Scholar
 
 
38.
Belkacem L, Mhamdi L, Simeu-Abazi Z, Messaoud H, Gascard E. Diagnosis of Hybrid Dynamical Systems through Hybrid Automata. IFAC-PapersOnLine. 2016;49(12):990-995.
Google Scholar
 
 
39.
Achbi MS, Kechida S. Methodology for monitoring and diagnosing faults of hybrid dynamic systems: a case study on a desalination plant. Diagnostyka, 2020;21(1):27:33. https://doi.org/10.29354/diag/....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
40.
Achbi MS, Kechida S. Hybrid dynamic systems fault diagnosis approach based on hybrid automata and ANFIS. 2nd international conference on Applied Automation and Industrial Diagnostics. ICAAID. Djelfa. 2017.
Google Scholar
 
 
41.
Achbi M S, Kechida S. Fault diagnosis of a reverse osmosis water desalination plant through a hybrid approach. International conference on Electronicsand new technologies.ICENT.M’sila. 2017.
Google Scholar
 
 
42.
Mhamdi L, Liouane N, Hassani M, Dhouibi H. Using interval petri nets and timed automata for diagnosis of discrete event systems (des). International Journal of Engineering. 2014;27(1): 113-122.
Google Scholar
 
 
43.
Achbi MS, Kechida S. Fault tolerant control of Reverse Osmosis Desalination Plant with the application of SCADA system. 2nd international conference on Applied Automation and Industrial Diagnostics. ICAAID. Djelfa. 2017.
Google Scholar
 
 
44.
Mhamdi L, Belkacem L, Dhouibi H, Abazi ZS. Using Hybrid Automata for Diagnosis of Hybrid Dynamical Systems. International Journal of Electrical & Computer Engineering. 2015;5(6).
Google Scholar
 
 
45.
Mhamdi L, Dhouibi H, Simeu-Abazi Z, Liouane, N. Modelling approach for discrete event systems through petri nets and timed automata. In 2013 International Conference on Control, Decision and Information Technologies (CoDIT). 2013;166-171.
Google Scholar
 
 
46.
Kechida S, Cocquempot V. Méthodologies de diagnostic des systèmes dynamiques: Théories et exemples. Kechida S, & Cocquempot V. Méthodologies de diagnostic des systèmes dynamiques: Théories et exemples. 2012.
Google Scholar
 
 
Share
Send by email
RELATED ARTICLE
Early detection and localization of stator inter turn faults based on variational mode decomposition and deep learning in induction motor
Diagnosis of ITSC fault in the electrical vehicle powertrain system through signal processing analysis
Least square support vectors machines approach to diagnosis of stator winding short circuit fault in induction motor
Methodology for monitoring and diagnosing faults of hybrid dynamic systems: a case study on a desalination plant
Wind turbine generator slip ring damage detection through temperature data analysis
Indexes
 
Keywords index
Topics index
Authors index
eISSN:2449-5220
Journals System - logo
System opracowano w ramach zadania:
„Podniesienie poziomu naukowego i poziomu umiędzynarodowienia czasopisma Diagnostyka oraz upowszechniania informacji o wynikach badań lub prac rozwojowych poprzez udział uznanych zagranicznych recenzentów w ocenie publikacji - zadanie finansowane w ramach umowy 745/P-DUN/2017. ze środków Ministra Nauki i Szkolnictwa Wyższego przeznaczonych na działalność upowszechniającą naukę”

© 2006-2024 Journal hosting platform by Bentus
Scroll to top