A survey of communication protocols in modern embedded condition monitoring systems
 
More details
Hide details
1
Akademia Górniczo-Hutnicza im. Stanisława Staszica w Krakowie
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Wojciech Staszewski   

Akademia Górniczo-Hutnicza im. Stanisława Staszica w Krakowie, Al. Mickiewicza 30, 30-059 Kraków, Polska
Online publication date: 2018-03-13
Publication date: 2018-06-11
Submission date: 2017-12-07
Final revision date: 2018-03-08
Acceptance date: 2018-03-08
 
Diagnostyka 2018;19(2):53–62
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
The aim of the paper is to present a recent development in the field of communication from the point of view of embedded machine condition monitoring system (CMS). Although the general purpose of CMS remains the same over years, various electronic innovations open new possibilities of enhancement, including lower price, smaller size, larger bandwidth, smaller energy consumption or larger distance for wireless transmission. The paper considers a general notion of an embedded monitoring system, which consists of a sensor, data acquisition and processing unit, storage peripherals, and a communication module for final data destination. For each of these defined parts, a detailed description of possible data transfer protocols and interfaces is given, including popular, and experimental ones.
 
REFERENCES (21)
1.
Basagni S; Naderi MY, Petrioli C. Spenza D. Wireless sensor networks with energy harvesting. In Mobile Ad Hoc Networking: The Cutting Edge Directions, Wiley, New York, NY, USA, 2013: 701–736. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781....
 
2.
Brasek C. Urban utilities warm up to the idea of wireless automatic meter reading. IEEE Computing & Control Engineering Journal, 2004; 15: 10-14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1049/cce:....
 
3.
Fall K. A delay-tolerant network architecture for challenged internets. In Proceedings of the 2003 Conference on Applications, Technologies, Architectures, and Protocols for Computer Communications, Karlsruhe, Germany, 25–29 August 2003; ACM: New York, NY, USA, 2003:27-34, http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/8639....
 
4.
Feldman M, Seibold S. Damage diagnosis of rotors: application of hilbert transform and multihypothesis testing. Journal of Vibration and Control, 1999;5: 421. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1077....
 
5.
Hameed Z, Ahn SH, Cho YM. Practical aspects of a condition monitoring system for a wind turbine with emphasis on its design, system architecture, testing and installation. Renewable Energy. 2010; 35(5): 879-894. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.re....
 
6.
Heinzelman WR, Chandrakasan A, Balakrishnan H. Energy-efficient communication protocol for wireless microsensor networks. Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Conference proceedings, 2000.
 
7.
Jyothi M, Ravi ChL, Sahithi M, Rani AJ, Poornima J, Sudha NN. Implementation of Low Complex and High Secured SPI Communication System for Multipurpose Applications. International Journal of Computer Science and Information Technologies, 2012; 3(1):3214-3219.
 
8.
Khan JA, Qureshi HK, Iqbal A. Energy management in wireless sensor networks: A survey. Computers and Electrical Engineering, 2015; 41:159–176 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.co....
 
9.
Khurana G, Goyal U. An insight comparison of serial communication protocols. international Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Science and Electronics Engineering (IJARCSEE), 2013; 2(3): 308-313.
 
10.
Milind A. Siddhpura, Arti M. Siddhpura, S.K. Bhave, Vibration as a parameter for monitoring the health of precision machine tools. ICDM-08, Coimbatore, India, February 01-02, 2008.
 
11.
Norhuzaimin J, Maimun HH, The design of high speed UART. Conference proceedings Applied Electromagnetics, 2005. APACE 2005. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/APAC....
 
12.
Raza T, Lang W, Jedermann R. Integration of Wireless Sensor Networks into Industrial Control Systems. Dynamics in Logistics, 2007:209-218. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-....
 
13.
Tian X, Li J, Fan Y, Yu X, Liu J. Design and Implementation of SPI Communication Based-on FPGA. Advanced Materials Research, 2001; 291-294: 2658-2661.
 
14.
Tomasi W. Advanced Electronic Communication Systems, Prentice Hall PTR Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, 1997.
 
15.
Tse D, Viswanath V. Fundamentals of Wireless Communication, Cambridge University Press, 2005.
 
16.
Visconti P, Giannotta G, Brama R, Primiceri P, Malvasi A. Features, operation principle and limits of SPI and I2C communication protocols for smart objects: a novel SPI-based hybrid protocol especially suitable for IoT applications, Int. Journal on Smart Sensing and Intelligent Systems, 2017;10(2):262-295 http://dx.doi.org/10.21307/ijs....
 
17.
Wang W, Tse PW, Lee J. Remote machine maintenance system through Internet and mobile communication. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing technology, 2007; 31:783-789 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s001....
 
18.
Willig A. Recent and emerging topics in wireless industrial communications. A selection. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 2008; 4(2): 102–124. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TII.....
 
19.
Valenta J. Cellular IoT Is the Fastest-Growing Opportunity for CEE Telcos, IDC Media Center, June 2017.
 
20.
Yick J, Mukherjee B, Ghosal D. Wireless sensor network survey. Comput. Netw. 2008; 52:2292-2330, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.co....
 
21.
Spence E. MEMS Comes of Age ‐ Review of a New Broadband 20kHz MEMS Accelerometer for Vibration Measurements. MFPT-ISA 2016, Dayton, OH, USA.
 
eISSN:2449-5220
ISSN:1641-6414