Optimum disturbance-aware quantum-inspired dual-loop control of a chopper-fed DC motor drive
More details
Hide details
1
Northern Technical University, Al-Minassa St., Mosul City, Nineveh Governorate, Iraq
Submission date: 2026-06-02
Final revision date: 2026-07-23
Acceptance date: 2026-08-12
Online publication date: 2026-08-19
Publication date: 2026-08-19
Corresponding author
Omar Talal Mahmood
Northern Technical University, Al-Minassa St., Mosul City, Nineveh Governorate
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
This paper proposes a disturbance-aware quantum-inspired control (DAQIC) algorithm for speed control of a chopper-fed separately excited DC motor drive using a cascaded two-loop speed-current control structure. The suggested approach handles the limitations of typical PI control caused by load torque fluctuations, DC-link voltage variation, armature resistance variations, and measurement noise. In the outer speed loop controller, normalized speed error and error rate change data are mapped to probability-like conservative and aggressive control weight values. In the inner current loop controller, a feedforward duty-cycle term extracted from the motor armature voltage equation is merged with a bounded quantum-inspired correction control. A voltage-aware feasible reference limiter approach is also initiated to prevent the controller from generating unreachable speed commands during voltage sags and high-load conditions. The proposed controller is analysed through MATLAB-based simulations under nominal and disturbed operating conditions, and the results are compared with those of a conventional PI dual-loop controller. The results demonstrate that the proposed method enhances feasible-reference tracking, eliminates excessive current deviation, and improves robustness under constrained operating conditions. These findings show that the proposed DAQIC algorithm offers a practical and efficient control framework to control the speed for chopper-fed DC motor drive applications.
FUNDING
REFERENCES (40)
2.
Gun WM, Jung HK, Hyun CC, Kwan YC, Myung JY. Quantum series resonant inverter for a DC motor drive. In: Proceedings of the 10th IEEE Region Conference on Computer, Communication, Control and Power Engineering. IEEE. 1993: 563-567.
https://doi.org/10.1109/tencon....
3.
Ramya Sri N, Kumar MP. An extended voltage gain three-level DC/DC bidirectional converter in an electric vehicle traction system. IEEE Access. 2025; 13: 146527-146556.
https://doi.org/10.1109/access....
4.
Antar RK, Allu AA, Ali AJ. Sensorless speed control of separately excited DC motor using neuro-fuzzy controller. In: 2013 International Conference on Electrical Communication, Computer, Power, and Control Engineering. IEEE. 2013: 37-42.
https://doi.org/10.1109/ICECCP....
5.
Negadi K, Boudiaf M, Araria R, Hadji L. Improvement of the amplification gain for a propulsion drives of an electric vehicle with sensor voltage and mechanical speed control. Smart Struct Syst. 2022; 29(5): 661-675.
https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2....
6.
Saidat S, Boumekhita R, Tadjine M, Zioui N. Experimental assessment of quantum PWM performance in DC motor speed control applications. In: 2025 International Conference on Decision Aid Sciences and Applications. IEEE. 2025: 970-975.
https://doi.org/10.1109/DASA68....
7.
Saidat S, Boumekhita R, Tadjine M, Zioui N, Quantum pulse-width modulation design and implementation for a DC motor drive, Quantum Inf. Process. 23 (2024) 1–24.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11128....
8.
Zhu H. Research on PLC DC motor speed control system based on quantum fuzzy control algorithm. In: Proceedings - International Conference on Applied Artificial Intelligence and Computing. IEEE. 2022: 1672-1675.
https://doi.org/10.1109/ICAAIC....
9.
Mohamed MT, Alkhalaf S, Senjyu T, Mohamed TH, Elnoby AM, Hemeida AM. A hybrid evolutionary approach for electric vehicle controller tuning: integration of WOA, QAA, and RMSProp. Results Eng. 2025; 27: 106389.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rine....
10.
Hanna YF, Khater AA, El-Bardini M, El-Nagar AM. Real-time adaptive PID controller based on quantum neural network for nonlinear systems. Eng Appl Artif Intell. 2023; 126: 106952.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enga....
11.
Md. Habibullah, Md. A. Hossain, Md. A. Rafiq, and B. C. Ghosh. Quantum evolutionary algorithm based fast speed controlled induction motor drive with CRTRL flux estimator. In: International Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering. IEEE. 2010:478-481.
https://doi.org/10.1109/icelce....
12.
Zioui N, Mahmoudi A, Fazilat M, Kone O, Dermouche R, Tadjine M. Quantum space vector pulse width modulation for speed control of permanent magnet synchronous machines. e-Prime Adv Electr Eng Electron Energy. 2025; 13: 101074.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prim....
13.
Ali JA, Hannan MA, Mohamed A, Jern KP, Abdolrasol MG. Implementation of DSP-based optimal fuzzy logic speed controller for IM drive using quantum lightning search algorithm. Measurement. 2020; 153: 107372.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meas....
14.
Yin Z, Wang L, Zhang Y, Gao Y. Parameter identification of DC arc models using chaotic quantum cuckoo search. Appl Soft Comput. 2021; 108: 107451.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc....
15.
Bouradi S, Negadi K, Araria R, Boumediene B, Koulali M. Design and implementation of a four-quadrant DC-DC converter based adaptive fuzzy control for electric vehicle application. Math Model Eng Probl. 2022; 9(3): 721-730.
https://doi.org/10.18280/mmep.....
16.
Moustafa E, Abou-Zalam B, Sobaih AA, Nabil E, Sayed A. Optimized fuzzy fractional-order controller for a nonlinear chaos system with period-doubling bifurcation analysis. Int J Control Autom Syst. 2023; 21: 3492-3503.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12555....
17.
Zirkohi MM. Fast terminal sliding mode control design for position control of induction motors using adaptive quantum neural networks. Appl Soft Comput. 2022; 115: 108268.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc....
18.
Arathy Rajeev VK, Valsalal P. ETEDPOF gain optimization for Cuk converter fed induction motor coupled with DC motor for smart EV. In: International Conference on Trends in Engineering Systems and Technologies. IEEE. 2025: 1-6.
https://doi.org/10.1109/ICTEST....
19.
Rajendar G, Kumar BV. High-gain bidirectional converter with hybrid greylag goose optimization and quantum convolutional neural network for intelligent energy management in electric vehicle charging systems. Iran J Sci Technol Trans Electr Eng. 2025; 1-25.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40998....
20.
D. Selvaraj, S. Nattuthurai, A. Uehara, T. Senjyu, Optimal energy management strategy for electric vehicles and electricity distribution system based on quantile deep learning with enhanced African vulture optimization, Energy Rep. 2024;12:631–655.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr....
21.
Mugemanyi S, Qu Z, Rugema FX, Dong Y, Bananeza C, Wang L. Marine predators algorithm: a comprehensive review. Mach Learn Appl. 2023; 12: 100471.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mlwa....
22.
Lalawat RS, Bajaj V, Padhy PK, Lin CY. Advancing motor imagery EEG classification by quantum feature integration and quantum support vector machines. Appl Acoust. 2025; 240: 110976.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apac....
23.
Liu J, et al. The road to quantum internet: progress in quantum network testbeds and major demonstrations. Prog Quantum Electron. 2025:100551.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pqua....
24.
Krishnan R. Electric motor drives: modeling, analysis, and control. 1st ed. New Jersey: Prentice Hall; 2001.
25.
Antar RK, Saleh AA, Yahia TT. Estimate and control speed of a DC motor using different power circuits. Przegl Elektrotech. 2023; 99: 271-276.
https://doi.org/10.15199/48.20....
26.
Al-Hajzber SM, Al-Rifaie AH, Sultan NS. Intelligent techniques of design and comparative study for DC motor speed control fed by photovoltaic and fuel cells. J Adv Res Dyn Control Syst. 2018; 10: 1365-1376.
27.
Saleh HA, Alsaif OI, Abdulkadir LY. Adaptive control of a DC servo motor using particle swarm and gray wolf optimization algorithms. In: AIP Conference Proceedings. AIP Publishing.; 2025.
https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0260....
29.
Mohan N, Undeland TM, Robbins WP. Power electronics: converters, applications, and design. 3rd ed. Hoboken: Wiley; 2003.
30.
Chapra SC, Canale RP. Numerical methods for engineers. New York: McGraw-Hill Higher Education; 2010.
31.
Xu C, Zhang C, Xu M, Chen J, Wang L, Han Z. Improved active disturbance rejection speed tracking control for high-speed trains based on SBWO algorithm. Algorithms 2025;18:566.
https://doi.org/10.3390/a18090....
32.
Belguedri M, Benrabah A, Khoucha F, Benbouzid M, Benmansour K. An improved uncertainty and disturbance estimator-based speed control for grid-connected pumping kite wind generator. Control Eng Pract 2024; 143: 105795.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cone....
33.
Gilbert EG, Kolmanovsky I, Tan KT. Discrete-time reference governors and the nonlinear control of systems with state and control constraints. Int J Robust Nonlinear Control 1995; 5: 487-504.
https://doi.org/10.1002/rnc.45....
34.
Han KH, Kim JH. Quantum-inspired evolutionary algorithm for a class of combinatorial optimization. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 2002; 6: 580-593.
https://doi.org/10.1109/TEVC.2....
35.
Garone E, Di Cairano S, Kolmanovsky I. Reference and command governors for systems with constraints: a survey on theory and applications. Automatica. 2017; 75: 306-328.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.auto....
37.
Han KH, Kim JH. On setting the parameters of quantum-inspired evolutionary algorithm for practical applications. In: The 2003 Congress on Evolutionary Computation. IEEE. 2003: 178-184.
https://doi.org/10.1109/cec.20....
38.
Vivek Y, Ravi V, Radha Krishna P. Quantum-inspired evolutionary algorithms for feature subset selection: a comprehensive survey. Quantum Inf Process. 2025; 24(7):1-44.
https://doi.org/10.1109/cec.20....
39.
Vivek, Y., Ravi, V. & Krishna, P.R. Quantum-inspired evolutionary algorithms for feature subset selection: a comprehensive survey. Quantum Inf Process 24, 196 (2025).
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11128....
40.
Anta RK, Suliman MY, Saleh AA. Harmonics resonance elimination technique using active static compensation circuit, Bull. Electr. Eng. Informatics. 2021;10:2405–2413.
https://doi.org/10.11591/eei.v....